Intel Arrow Lake-S processor line-up has leaked again: slide with detailed specifications

The initial lineup includes:

• Core Ultra 9 285K
• Core Ultra 7 265K
• Core Ultra 7 265KF
• Core Ultra 5 245K
• Core Ultra 5 245KF

The Arrow Lake-S series will eliminate hyper-threading and include more efficiency (E) cores. Special:

• Core Ultra 9 285K: 8 Performance (P) cores and 16 E cores
• Core Ultra 7 265K/265KF: 8 P cores and 12 E cores
• Core Ultra 5 245K/245KF: 6 P cores and 8 E cores

All models feature Intel’s Thermal Velocity Boost, which was previously only available on high-end Core i9 processors. Additionally, only the Core Ultra 9 and Core Ultra 7 support Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0. The Thermal Design Power (TDP) for the Core Ultra 9 and 7 is up to 250 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 has a TDP of up to 159 watts. Each processor has a base power consumption of 125 watts.

About performance:

• Core Ultra 9: Boosts up to 5.7GHz
• Core Ultra 7: Boosts up to 5.5GHz
• Core Ultra 5: Boosts up to 5.2GHz

The Core Ultra 5 has the highest base frequency with P cores at 4.2 GHz and E cores at 3.6 GHz. The Core Ultra 7 has P-cores at 3.9GHz and E-cores at 3.3GHz, while the Core Ultra 9 operates at 3.7GHz for P-cores and 3.2GHz for E-cores.

Memory support has been improved in the Arrow Lake-S series, with support for DDR5-6400 memory, which is 800 MHz faster than the memory speed supported by the 14th generation Core i processors. The platform can handle up to 192GB of RAM, keeping the same maximum as previous Intel desktop CPUs.

The integrated graphics in the Arrow Lake-S processors have four Xe cores that run at a base clock of 300 MHz and can be boosted up to 2 GHz. The Core Ultra 5 models have a slightly lower boost clock of 1.9 GHz for their integrated graphics. All models feature a third-generation Neural Processing Unit (NPU) with a performance of 13 Tera Operations Per Second (TOPS), which is less than the Core Ultra 200V Lunar Lake mobile CPUs, which offer up to 48 TOPS depending on the model .

The information from the leak matches previous data from the same source, suggesting it is reliable. However, it is recommended to wait for official confirmation from Intel to verify these details.